[Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Glen Dosey doseyg at r-networks.netMon Aug 20 11:32:12 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IEEE 1588 (PTP) - a better cluster clock?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I am having issues with read performance on our cluster using NFS ( and also SMB) . Any initial file transfer to the clients seems to be limited to ~40MB/s. This is not a limitation of the underlying array, as I can read the same file on the server at ~160MB/s. Similarly, after the file has been read into memory on the server, the clients can read it at ~100MB/s (this is following a NFS umount and mount on the client). The clients can write to the server at ~90MB/s. All of this leads me to believe the issue I am experiencing is not directly network or disk related, but rather a factor of the network latency combined with disk request latency, such that the client is not sending enough read requests (fast enough) to keep the server disk busy. I looked into a method to have the client or server NFS perform a read ahead such that it would keep the disk busy and alleviate the latency performance hit I suggest above. Perhaps someone can offer a solution or point me in a different direction as the above may not really be the issue. I have tried adjusting a number of kernel parameters to increase the TCP window size but it has not had any affect. Thanks, Glen I've left out a lot of detail to keep this succinct. I can provide it when necessary.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IEEE 1588 (PTP) - a better cluster clock?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
