[Beowulf] scheduler policy design
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Toon Knapen toon.knapen at fft.beTue Apr 24 05:26:07 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] scheduler policy design
- Next message: [Beowulf] Semi-OT: IO benchmark report
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Cutts wrote: > > But remember you don't necessarily need to have separate queues if your > scheduler supports asking for multiple job slots on a single machine (as > in the LSF example I gave in my last posting). John's suggestion is an > alternative way to achieve the same thing, although it introduces other > questions, such as what's the relative priority of the two queues, and > does the scheduler support backfill scheduling between the queues to > help short single threaded jobs run while it is reserving processors for > the parallel job? Right, but so how would you solve the problem you describe above ? thanks, toon
- Previous message: [Beowulf] scheduler policy design
- Next message: [Beowulf] Semi-OT: IO benchmark report
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
