[Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caWed Apr 18 05:14:34 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Linux laptops, and M$ advertisement
- Next message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> in anycase, if this is a non-streaming latency result, it's >> pretty good; enough to make quadrics look comprehensively out >> of the picture (guess they've switched horses to 10GE anyway.) > > It is a non-streaming latency on Mellanox ConnectX. On MPI it > is 1.2us latency - Pallas MPI Ping. this is something like 3x better than previous IB - a difference of that magnitude must always raise eyebrows. how was such a dramatic improvement made? what was so badly broken in previous incarnations? is there some caveat to the new score, like requiring all of userspace to be pre-pinned, or buffers to be 4k aligned or something? also, just to be perfectly explicit, this is 1.2 us inter-node, right? not something crazy like two 8-core boxes with only two of 16 hops inter-box? thanks, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Linux laptops, and M$ advertisement
- Next message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
