[Beowulf] SGI to offer Windows on clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mike Davis jmdavis1 at vcu.eduMon Apr 16 11:16:19 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SGI to offer Windows on clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] SGI to offer Windows on clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert G. Brown wrote: > On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Mike Davis wrote: > >> one desire is supported stability. My number two desire is speed. >> Maybe this philosophy comes from all of my years in unix world (21 and >> counting), but the idea of standardizing on something that has the >> limited longterm support of FC scares me. We regulalry run nodes for >> years without reboot. > > > You do, of course, see the oxymoron inherent in this statement. You > regularly run nodes for years without a reboot. Hence after the nodes > are installed and stabilized (something that will almost certainly take > place during the period where FC is in fact well supported) support > becomes irrelevant, because the distro is stable and "just works". Actually I don't think that its an oxymoron, though I have occasionally had my behavior described as moronic. The fact that nodes run for more than a year does not necessarily mean that we might not need to update them from a supported distro at some point. It happens occasionally. As an administrator of centrally operated clusters, I particularly don't want to have to deal with an issue brought about by a problem on an OS that is past it's support. It just isn't worth it to me technically or politically. Mike
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SGI to offer Windows on clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] SGI to offer Windows on clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
