[Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jon Forrest jlforrest at berkeley.eduSun Apr 8 17:29:27 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Hahn wrote: >> add the additional difficulty of getting 64-bit drivers > > for windows, at least. 64b-ness was never much of an issue for linux. The title of the message I was responding to was about Win64, but your point is valid. Switching to 64-bits is much easier in the Linux world than the WinXX world. > I think you underestimate the number of jobs that can effectively > use more than 2GB/proc, and which can make excellent use of having > twice as many registers. not to mention the fact that the kernel likes > having a big-flat address space, even if procs get by with 32b. I made no claims about the number of apps that need more address space than they get in the 32-bit world, only that additional address space is the only reason for making the switch. I admittedly don't have references at hand about my claim about the advantages of the additional registers being reduced by the increased number of bits. This came up several years ago when x86-64 was first coming out. If somebody has newer data I'll be the first to retract my claim. I think it makes intuitive sense, though. > 32b procs run rather well on 64b systems - you get small pointers > and you don't get those annoying extra registers. just compile -m32. Again, I agree that on Linux this is true, but in a Win64 cluster the additional difficulties of switching to 64-bits make this more of a problem. > I've heard it said that some DB's have surprisingly large text. I worked as a SQLServer developer at Sybase, and in the Postgres research group at UCB and I never noticed this. Maybe things have changed since then. The one area where I've heard text gets quite large is in CAD simulations, but much of the code isn't human written. For yuks, I recently added up the text size of *every* executable program and library I found on my Fedora Core 6 system. I did not do a very good job at weeding out the dups caused by symbolic links and the like, but the sum total of *all* these text segments would have easily fit in a 32-bit address space. -- Jon Forrest Unix Computing Support College of Chemistry 173 Tan Hall University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-1460 510-643-1032 jlforrest at berkeley.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
