[Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl greg.lindahl at qlogic.comMon Apr 9 09:14:02 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:04:21AM -0700, Michael Will wrote: > I saw Spec benchmarks published with portions of it compiled for > 32bit for best results. But the bottom line is that default in 64bit > is faster and some special cases could benefit from 32bit... Oh, you want a *serious* answer! I don't know for SPECcpu2006, but with SPECcpu2000, a couple of the integer benchmarks ran faster in 32-bit, and none of the floating point benchmarks. Our compiler run 2x faster as a 32-bit binary, because it has very bad cache behavior when pointers get twice as large -- it uses a lot of them. But the general rule is that code is 15% faster in 64-bit, thanks to the extra registers and better calling convention. And a few codes (especially multi-precision integer codes like crypto) benefit from 64-bit integers. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
