[Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl greg.lindahl at qlogic.comSun Apr 8 23:44:43 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 04:57:18PM -0700, Jon Forrest wrote: > For apps that > don't need the extra address space, the benefits of > the additional registers in x86-64 are nearly undone > by the need to move more bits around, Man, good thing you noticed. We'll have to change the default on our compiler, and re-run all those benchmarks in 32-bit mode. I wonder why nobody ever noticed before? -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
