[Beowulf] GPFS on Linux (x86)
ctierney at hypermall.net
Thu Sep 14 06:02:02 PDT 2006
Mark Hahn wrote:
>> required that you buy their storage. Also the licensing of
>> GPFS was based on the quantity of storage, which I didn't like.
> HP's version of Lustre (SFS) is also capacity-licensed
> (and I agree, it's a customer-hostile policy.)
Yes, I was aware of this as well. I just blanked on it in
my first email.
>> I really don't seem many people discussing the good and bad things
>> about the current crop of distributed/shared filesystems. Do
>> they sign a contract saying they can disclose any information about
>> their operation?
> well, if you spend significant money on a commercial product,
> and are using/depending on it, it's not attractive to embarass
> the vendor in public.
>> IBM GPFS
>> (Did I forget some).
> Lustre/SFS and Redhat GFS, certainly.
Sorry, of course Lustre should have been on this list.
Does GFS work in distributed mode? I didn't add it
to the list because since it is a shared filesystem
(multiple clients access the block devices directly)
I didn't include it. If we include GFS, then we
also have to include at least SGI CXFS and ADIC StorNext.
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
More information about the Beowulf