[Beowulf] NFS Performance using SLES 10
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caMon Sep 11 11:12:20 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NFS Performance using SLES 10
- Next message: [Beowulf] NFS Performance using SLES 10
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I have a small two-node cluster with AMD64 Opteron processors. It was > running Centos 4 and NFS performance was good while not hindering > performance. I replaced Centos with SLES 10 about 2 weeks ago and just now > got around to really hitting it hard submitting jobs. Processes that > normally took about 15 seconds such as normal IO (each processor writes its > own data file) now require 10-15 minutes. When I observed the IO status, I the magnitude of this difference is not just a matter of tuning. for instance, NFS exports have changed over the past few years in whether they require the 'async' flag. that's something that can easily cause big differences in performance. do you have a reasonable number of nfsd's running? if UDP, are you sure you're not seeing some problem with fragmented packets?
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NFS Performance using SLES 10
- Next message: [Beowulf] NFS Performance using SLES 10
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
