[Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eric W. Biederman ebiederm at xmission.comThu Sep 7 11:54:10 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
- Next message: [Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ashley Pittman <ashley at quadrics.com> writes: > I think Daniel was talking about supercomputer networks and not > ethernet, on the first QsNet2 machine I have to hand latency without > interrupts is 2.72uSec, using interrupts it is 7.20uSec. One > fundamental difference between these two measurements is that when you > use interrupts the kernel has to get involved, without interrupts it > doesn't so you don't just have the interrupt but also a extra syscall. > > I know of people who have tried to tune the Hz rate down as low as 10, > I'm fairly sure they wrote a paper about it. Ok. Those numbers sound believable. Although they feel a little high, which probably just means no one has done any serious tuning there. At 5us latency after polling for just a short while you can likely go to sleep without experiencing any real penalty. Say within a milisecond or so of polling you can sleep. Eric
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
- Next message: [Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
