[Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bogdan Costescu Bogdan.Costescu at iwr.uni-heidelberg.deWed Sep 6 06:56:00 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
- Next message: [Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Mark Hahn wrote: > 100 Hz scheduler ticks might make sense Please don't mention this to beginners (which is the impression that the original message left me) - if they care enough to search the information available on the subject they will either make their own mind or come back here to ask a specific question... Higher scheduler frequency was demanded, among others, by network developers who see the backlog run at this frequency - when this is too low, the network latency in certain situations increases which is undesired for most cluster applications. IMHO, low scheduler frequency is probably only good for mostly computational jobs (f.e. Monte Carlo style) where such latency doesn't matter and the small amount of time saved due to the lower number of context switches is used for real computations. -- Bogdan Costescu IWR - Interdisziplinaeres Zentrum fuer Wissenschaftliches Rechnen Universitaet Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY Telephone: +49 6221 54 8869, Telefax: +49 6221 54 8868 E-mail: Bogdan.Costescu at IWR.Uni-Heidelberg.De
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
- Next message: [Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
