[Beowulf] Re: blackbox on Mars?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.govMon Oct 30 15:16:45 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: blackbox on Mars?
- Next message: [Beowulf] IBM p5 cluster discussion list (off-topic)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 02:23 PM 10/30/2006, Geoff Jacobs wrote: >Jim Lux wrote: > > > > reduce the variance. Something else to do with that Beowulf sitting in > > your garage.. >I believe these techniques require multiple, short exposure samples. >Apparently, KH-12s have a capability for real time video. I expect the >frame rate from such would make multi-sampling a difficult noise >reduction method to apply. See, e.g., http://citseer.ist.psu.edu/95070.html David Tyler,"PARSEC...", We describe a speckle imaging reconstruction code written for very fast image reconstruction on a parallel computing platform such as the IBM SP2. We describe the algorithms used for all stages of image reconstruction and present results of a sensitivity study using data obtained with the Maui Space Surveillance Site 1.6-m telescope If that isn't a cluster app..... > IR imagery is one thing to think about. Radar is another. X band radar > > (9-10 GHz) easily gives you 3cm sorts of resolution, especially with SAR > > processing. >IR imagery does allow remote sensing at night, but it is affected by >weather. Also, IR typically has less resolution. > >Radar allows all-weather remote sensing. Radar antennas are more easily >compacted for launch, too. However, you won't find Joe Taliban humping >the Hindu Kush with SAR (unless you can image his Kalishnakov). Sure you can, if you know where to look. The real challenge is separating the slow moving human from the ground clutter. Humans make a fine radar target (being big jelly bags with high dielectric constant, they have a fairly decent RCS). Could one resolve individual features like fingers and toes? Might be a bit tricky. Track a moving car as RGB asked? Not a problem. Again, the challenge is getting suitable coverage.. you want the angle of incidence to be something other than vertical (so you have some doppler to help remove clutter), but that implies low satellite height, which means you need lots of them for 24/7 coverage. Check out Discoverer II or "Space Based Radar" Jim
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: blackbox on Mars?
- Next message: [Beowulf] IBM p5 cluster discussion list (off-topic)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
