[Beowulf] Slightly OT: storage performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Piskorski atp at piskorski.comSun Nov 12 14:25:00 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Slightly OT: storage performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] Node Drop-Off
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 09:18:01AM -0800, Buccaneer for Hire. wrote: > The minimum file size for testing should be at least twice the maximum > estimated cache in the system. So, we use the amount of memory on the > head node and all the cache on the EMC and double it. Wouldn't it make for more convenient tests to instead write some helper program which grabs most of the memory on the box? Then you could do good, non-cached tests with much smaller file sizes? -- Andrew Piskorski <atp at piskorski.com> http://www.piskorski.com/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Slightly OT: storage performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] Node Drop-Off
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list