NFS Performance (was Re: [Beowulf] GPFS on Linux (x86))
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.orgWed Nov 8 18:57:26 PST 2006
- Previous message: NFS Performance (was Re: [Beowulf] GPFS on Linux (x86))
- Next message: [Beowulf] Apologies for the spam/virus yesterday
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Saturday 16 September 2006 00:32, Brent Franks wrote: > On 9/15/06, Chris Samuel <csamuel at vpac.org> wrote: > > > Wild guess - NFS servers are running RHEL and using ext3 ? > > Exactly. If you are using RHEL4 and are not at Update 4 already then apparently there is a RH induced bug in the default cfq io_scheduler and the work around is (according to Oracle at least [1]) to set the node to use the deadline scheduler at boot time as well. The better fix is apparently to update to RHEL4 U4. [1] - Their OCFS2 page says: # RHEL4 U2 and U3 users are advised to use the DEADLINE io scheduler instead # of the default CFQ due to Bugzilla# 184535. (Ed: [2]) [2] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184535 cheers, Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03)9925 4751 - VPAC Deputy Systems Manager Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing http://www.vpac.org/ Bldg 91, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20061109/a99d0bb8/attachment.bin
- Previous message: NFS Performance (was Re: [Beowulf] GPFS on Linux (x86))
- Next message: [Beowulf] Apologies for the spam/virus yesterday
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
