[Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew D. Fant fant at pobox.comThu Mar 23 13:25:58 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Next message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John Hearns wrote: > Eh? Install the libraries in /usr/local/xxxxx on the head node. > Export this as an NFS share. Mount on all nodes, and put it into your > LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > IMHO, there is very little reason for installing APPLICATION level > libraries on individual nodes. uhm, aside from NFS being SLOW and not scaling well? For a small cluster, yes, it will work, but I wouldn't want to go above 50 nodes without something with a little more oomph, or at least a couple dedicated IO nodes. And if I were depending on the PGI compilers and core math libraries like Atlas, FFTW and ACML, I wouldn't think twice about adding their runtime libraries to my core image for the compute nodes. Just my CAD 0.026 Andy -- Andrew Fant | And when the night is cloudy | This space to let Molecular Geek | There is still a light |---------------------- fant at pobox.com | That shines on me | Disclaimer: I don't Boston, MA | Shine until tomorrow, Let it be | even speak for myself
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Next message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
