[Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns john.hearns at streamline-computing.comThu Mar 23 12:48:00 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Next message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 15:51 -0300, Ivan Silvestre Paganini Marin wrote: > Hello everybody at beowulf list. I am compiling my application using PGI > compilers for fortran 95, and some libraries, like fftw, lapack and > scalapack (from PGI or not, like ACML). I am curious to see if a static > compilated program is fastest than a dynamic one. Static has it's > advantages (I will be running this application on several nodes, so if > it is dynamic I will have to install the libraries on each node, etc), Eh? Install the libraries in /usr/local/xxxxx on the head node. Export this as an NFS share. Mount on all nodes, and put it into your LD_LIBRARY_PATH. IMHO, there is very little reason for installing APPLICATION level libraries on individual nodes. Of course, having said that our Score compiled applications are static, and perform very well thankyou.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Next message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
