[Beowulf] Minimum cable length
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
steve_heaton at iinet.net.au steve_heaton at iinet.net.auWed Mar 22 19:41:14 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Pah!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Minimum cable length
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dear Great Minds Not strictly a Beowulf question but I suspect knowledge on the topic lurks herein. I can't seem to find a straight answer on the "real" *minimum* cable length for gigabit ethernet. I'm looking to make things on my new toy nice and tidy. Assume Cat5e/Cat6 cable, Intel e1000 NICs pushing the data rate to 'maximum', jumbo packets, cut through switching, titanium alloy mounting bracket screws etc. Minimum physical target length of 200mm. >From my limited understanding of such things, surely there would be some sort of electrical issue with too short a cable corrupting signalling/bits etc? The Net seems to vary between selling you a 0.5m cable v's "never use less than 1.0m" v's "there's no practical limit to how short". Thoughts and comments appreciated. Worse case I'll prolly try a 1m v's a 0.25m and check error rates :) Cheers Stevo
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Pah!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Minimum cable length
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
