[Beowulf] Re: Cluster newbie, power recommendations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comTue Mar 21 10:06:17 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Cluster newbie, power recommendations
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Cluster newbie, power recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Mathog wrote: > Interesting question that, how else might this be done? > > I wonder if one couldn't set up a single modern computer, > with a fast CPU and tons of memory, as N virtual machines, for > instance using VMware, and then run a sort of virtual cluster? Ouch... VMWare is really nice, but the VM slows things *way* down. > Obviously there wouldn't be any performance advantage to doing > this but it might allow the subject to be taught when a real > clusters isn't available. Not sure of the performance impact of this, but you could look at OpenVZ or Xen as well (when it is ready). Something like this is probably the way folks may go anyway so you can boot a cluster of any flavor from a good base load (OpenVZ'ed Warewulf anyone?) > Presumably VMware already has some method for handling the network > needs of each virtual machine, although I'm guessing it might Yes it does. > not extend all the way to a DHCP boot emulation. There would also It can in theory do that as well. I stopped using my copy of VMware in the 4.0 days. It is up to 5.5, so it might be quite a bit better. I went back to dual boot because of the speed. > need to be some sort of peculiar performance measurement system > at the VMware level since it would have to pretend that the > N machines running sequentially were actually working in parallel, > and report performance as if they had been. Would be hard. Should just get a dual dual-core machine and run a virtual process per core. Gives you a cluster of 4 nodes. Of course, why do that when you have this beautiful 4-way SMP... Sometimes it is better to "just say no" to distributed computing, and this is one of the cases :) > Seems doable. Maybe even worth doing so that this subject could > be more easily taught. I find that students have no trouble launching 4-8 threads on a single node to test code, and then have them run it on the real cluster/SMP using MPI. For OpenMP they are more hindered by the lack of free tools (there are multiple free MPI tools, no free OpenMP tools that I am aware of... discounting the "free" Intel compilers which cannot be installed on a teaching cluster due to the license which prevents *paid* teachers from installing it for free on a teaching cluster). > Regards, Joe (teaching a course on MPI/OpenMP application programming right now) -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Cluster newbie, power recommendations
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Cluster newbie, power recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
