[Beowulf] Three notes from ISC 2006
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kevin Ball kball at pathscale.comWed Jun 28 10:30:01 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Three notes from ISC 2006
- Next message: [Beowulf] Three notes from ISC 2006
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrick, > > From you flawed white papers, you compared your own results against > numbers picked from the web, using older interconnect with unknown > software versions. I have spent many hours searching to try to find application results with newer Myrinet and Mellanox interconnects. I would be thrilled (and I suspect others might as well, but I'm only speaking for myself) if you would take these white papers as a challenge and publish application results with the latest and greatest hardware and software. Microbenchmarks are not sufficient to determine application performance. Everyone benefits from there being more information available on application performance; End users, because they can make better choices, and vendors because they learn where they can improve things. If I'm wrong, and there really is a site out there somewhere with application performance on new hardware and software, please point it out. Thanks! -Kevin
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Three notes from ISC 2006
- Next message: [Beowulf] Three notes from ISC 2006
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
