[Beowulf] Acceptable rad limits for cluster rooms?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl greg.lindahl at qlogic.comMon Jun 19 14:52:59 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Acceptable rad limits for cluster rooms?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:45:40PM -0700, Jim Lux wrote: > >Processor *caches* do have ECC, and since they're more susceptible > >than the logic, this gets most of the benefit. > > Some caches do, some don't. You will be hard-pressed to find one you'd use in a Linux cluster that doesn't have ECC, other than L1 icache which tends to just have parity and invalidation if there's a single-bit error. > And it's tough to find out exactly what they mean by ECC. That's very true, that's usually a secret right up there with the cache replacement algorithm. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Acceptable rad limits for cluster rooms?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
