[Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl greg.lindahl at qlogic.comSat Jun 17 00:13:02 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Next message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:36:22AM +0100, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > Several persons replied and not a SINGLE ONE of them talks about > one way pingpong latency, which is one of the most important features > of a highend network for *many* applications. Actually several of them did mention it, but I guess you (and they) haven't seen my talk where I show some real applications where the rate that you can send small messages is the dominant predictor of performance. e.g. InfiniPath is 2X lower ping-pong latency, but can get much better than 2X the performance on real applications, if they're streaming small messages. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Next message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
