[Beowulf] Re: Feedback on large pages in Linux (hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl greg.lindahl at qlogic.comFri Jul 28 22:29:38 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Feedback on large pages in Linux (hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Feedback on large pages in Linux (hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 06:55:29PM -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote: > Isn't there a fairly general rule of thumb, that systems that get a > large benefit from streaming I/O through a cache of any size pay a > penalty in terms of repeated flushes for sufficiently NON-streaming > (random or variable stride) I/O? Uh, yeah. However, in a system with multiple page sizes, nobody says that you have to use the large size for your file mmaps or I/O. Paging is also less efficient with large pages, but modern systems don't page much. BTW, you should warn me when you invoke my name at the end of a long post, it's not like I'm as omniscient as Kibo... > (working for a compiler company, after all;-)... ... did a lot more work on the interconnect. Maybe I just suffer from Male Answer Syndrome? -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Feedback on large pages in Linux (hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Feedback on large pages in Linux (hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
