[Beowulf] CLuster - Mpich - tstmachines - Heeelp !!!!!!!!
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Leif Nixon nixon at nsc.liu.seFri Jul 28 08:33:32 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] CLuster - Mpich - tstmachines - Heeelp !!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] CLuster - Mpich - tstmachines - Heeelp !!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Geoff Jacobs <gdjacobs at gmail.com> writes: > hahn at physics.mcmaster.ca wrote: >> right - I don't have a problem with rsh as an internal cluster spawn >> method. >> though since you almost certainly also have sshd running, it makes sense >> to have fewer daemons. > It's okay for a small cluster where you have really good control over > the users. Now, THAT'S a very dangerous mindset. Even if you can be 100% sure there are no bad apples among your users, every single HPC related intrusion I'm aware of the last couple of years has started off by stealing passwords or keys and masquerading as legitimate users. -- Leif Nixon - Systems expert ------------------------------------------------------------ National Supercomputer Centre - Linkoping University ------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [Beowulf] CLuster - Mpich - tstmachines - Heeelp !!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] CLuster - Mpich - tstmachines - Heeelp !!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
