[Beowulf] Clusters and Distro Lifespans
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joshua Baker-LePain jlb17 at duke.eduWed Jul 19 08:20:36 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Clusters and Distro Lifespans
- Next message: [Beowulf] Clusters and Distro Lifespans
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 at 10:51am, hahn at physics.mcmaster.ca wrote > I think it's more a matter of taste/comfort. I hate running a kernel > that's more than 6 months old, since I'm often aware of problems fixed > during that time, etc. if your distro has only a 2.4 kernel, for instance, > IMO, you are losing quite a lot. if your distro has a 2.6.9 kernel, > you're still missing, for instance, sata smart support. Note that with some distros, the base kernel version has less meaning than you think as it's so heavily patched. RHEL4 has, yes, a kernel labeled 2.6.9. But, to counter your example, it also (as of U2 (or was it U3?)) supports SATA SMART. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Clusters and Distro Lifespans
- Next message: [Beowulf] Clusters and Distro Lifespans
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
