[Beowulf] Clusters and Distro Lifespans
gerald.davies at gmail.com
Tue Jul 18 13:19:33 PDT 2006
> From: John Hearns <john.hearns at streamline-computing.com>
> Fedora isn't the only kid on the block, and given the short support
> lifetime I would recommend against using it in a cluster.
> Fedora is clearly aimed and billed as a cutting edge distro, which will
> have a release every six months.
> Most of our clusters have SuSE linux installed, which runs very well on
> Our commercial customers tend to go for Redhat Enterprise or SuSE SLES,
> for compatibility and support of ISV codes.
I'm new to posting, however, i do read the list :)
John's comment about the short support lifetime of FC raises one of my
concerns about distros and cluster set-ups in general. In my
department we have RH/FC based clusters. When purchased they came
with a pre-installed distro and have pxeboot/images. I then spent
time tuning them to our needs.
My questions relating to this are:
i) Is the practice of buying clusters with pre-installed distros popular?
ii) Would it be better to develop our own installation process for
clusters so that upgrades, in terms of distros, can be rolled out
easily? I feel like i'm tied in some way to the supplier of our
cluster for upgrades.
iii) Do people regularly upgrade their clusters in relation to
distros? I guess this is like asking how long is a piece of string
because everyone's needs are different.
Apologies if this sounds like a strange first post :)
More information about the Beowulf