[Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caSun Jan 29 22:18:22 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Next message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > I tend to think of IB as mainly for high-bandwidth, since afaikt its > > latency isn't even as good as myri 2g (mx, 3 us). to say nothing of > > myri 10g, quadrics, numalink, sci. > > I know some people don't think of InfiniPath as being InfiniBand, but > really, Mark, I didn't think you were one of them! ;-) hmm, I had the impression that InfiniPath operated in either fast InfiniPath-to-InfiniPath mode, or in slow generic IB mode. that is, that in "fast" mode, it was mostly just recycling IB phy layers. > In any case, yes, you are correct for Mellanox InfiniBand HCAs, but > not for InfiniPath. so if Mellanox IB has latency X, and InfiniPath has Y, the expected latency between the two is around (X+Y)/2?
- Previous message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Next message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
