[Beowulf] since we are talking about file systems ...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
PS pesch at attglobal.netSun Jan 22 14:41:29 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] since we are talking about file systems ...
- Next message: [Beowulf] since we are talking about file systems ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Indexing is the key; observe how Google accesses millions of files in split seconds; this could easily be achieved in a PC file system. Paul Joe Landman wrote: > Methinks I lost lots of folks with my points ... > > Major thesis is that on well designed hardware/software/filesystems, > 50000 files is not a problem for accesses (though from a management > point of view it is a nightmare). For poorly designed/implemented > file systems it is a nightmare. > > Way back when in the glory days of SGI, I seem to remember xfs being > tested with millions of files per directory (though don't hold me to > that old memory). Call this hearsay at this moment. > > A well designed and implemented file system shouldn't bog you down as > you scale out in size, even if you shouldn't. Its sort of like your > car. If you go beyond 70 MPH somewhere in the US that supports such > speeds, your transmission shouldn't just drop out because you hit 71 MPH. > > Graceful degradation is a good thing. > > Joe > >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] since we are talking about file systems ...
- Next message: [Beowulf] since we are talking about file systems ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
