[Beowulf] [landman@scalableinformatics.com: Re: [Bioclusters] FPGA in bioinformatics clusters (again?)]
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eugen Leitl eugen at leitl.orgSat Jan 14 02:18:48 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] [landman@scalableinformatics.com: Re: [Bioclusters] FPGA in bioinformatics clusters (again?)]
- Next message: [Beowulf] [kathleen@massivelyparallel.com: RE: [Bioclusters] FPGA in bioinformatics clusters (again?)]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Forwarded message from Joe Landman <landman at scalableinformatics.com> ----- From: Joe Landman <landman at scalableinformatics.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:33:43 -0500 To: "Clustering, compute farming & distributed computing in life science informatics" <bioclusters at bioinformatics.org> Subject: Re: [Bioclusters] FPGA in bioinformatics clusters (again?) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) Reply-To: "Clustering, compute farming & distributed computing in life science informatics" <bioclusters at bioinformatics.org> Kathleen wrote: >TIA: > >One thing to consider when using FPGAs for bioinformatics or any complex >computational life science application is whether or not the FPGA supports >cross coupled communication. ... which is needed in which algorithms? >I believe FPGAs do not, therefore, FPGAs will >be limited in scalability, performance and very expensive. FPGA performance on various algorithms is already 1 to 2 orders of magnitude (e.g. 10 to 100 times) faster than single CPUs. The price points of modern FPGA boards with modern algorithms is about 2-4x single node pricing. As FPGAs improve (and they are), expect to achieve significantly more performance. [...] >almost have HMMR and GROMACS parallelized and will be parallelizing AMBER or >some other MD code next. Hmmm.... HMMer was parallelized using PVM quite some time ago, and using MPI quite recently (with excellent results reported). GROMACS also has been parallel for a while. Gromacs: http://www.gromacs.org/benchmarks/scaling.php HMMer: http://hmmer.wustl.edu Amber and many other MD codes have been parallelized for a while now... >Kathleen Erickson >Senior Marcom Strategist , Massively Parallel Technologies, Inc. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 cell : +1 734 612 4615 _______________________________________________ Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters at bioinformatics.org https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20060114/9242f936/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [Beowulf] [landman@scalableinformatics.com: Re: [Bioclusters] FPGA in bioinformatics clusters (again?)]
- Next message: [Beowulf] [kathleen@massivelyparallel.com: RE: [Bioclusters] FPGA in bioinformatics clusters (again?)]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
