[Beowulf] Why I want a Microsoft cluster... redux
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.govWed Jan 4 14:02:46 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Why I want a Microsoft cluster... redux
- Next message: [Beowulf] Why I want a Microsoft cluster... redux
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 11:22 AM 1/4/2006, Douglas Eadline wrote: >I enjoyed the discussion brought on by Jim Lux's advocacy about Microsoft >clusters. However, something about it bothered me. Well, I thought about >the issue over the holidays and ended up writing about it on Cluster >Monkey: > >"Why Is Cluster HPC So Hard?" > >I'm sure there are other opinions, so read and comment if you so choose. > >You can find it on the main page: http://www.clustermonkey.net Excellent essay.. A comment on appliances... Think of a waffle iron or a toaster. It's purpose designed, and the need doesn't really change. I toast about as much toast today as I did 10 years ago, and there's not much need to upgrade my toaster. Likewise, the waffle iron. I just bought a new waffle iron since the one I got back 15 years ago finally seemed to be dying, but it was just fine until then. We might speak of computer based "appliances" (firewalls, network attached storage, etc.), but realistically, they aren't. The job we ask them to do is continuously evolving. Would that I could have a web enabled lawn sprinkler controller that would realistically last 10 years (which is perfectly reasonable for the existing microcontroller based one that cost all of $30.), but I think that's unrealistic. Quick.. how many list members are using old style Ethernet with the thick cable, vampire taps, and separate AUIs? Or even, RG-58 based coax ethernet? 10 years ago, in 1996, 10Base2 Thinnet was state of the art. My 10 year old toaster still toasts. My 25+ year old Sony trinitron still works. And, not only do they still work, but they also still fully meet the needs, which haven't really advanced all that much. So, unlike a Sony PS/1, or a cluster computer, they haven't become boat anchors. Maybe this is what "appliance" really means? James Lux, P.E. Spacecraft Radio Frequency Subsystems Group Flight Communications Systems Section Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 161-213 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena CA 91109 tel: (818)354-2075 fax: (818)393-6875
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Why I want a Microsoft cluster... redux
- Next message: [Beowulf] Why I want a Microsoft cluster... redux
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
