[Beowulf] Re: What vendors would you be sure to check out?
Gerry Creager N5JXS
gerry.creager at tamu.edu
Mon Jan 2 21:17:11 PST 2006
David Kewley wrote:
> On Saturday 31 December 2005 08:14, Bill Rankin wrote:
>>On Dec 30, 2005, at 4:10 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>>>First of all, thanks much to all who responded!
>>Thanks for the list, Dan. I appreciate your efforts.
>>>- A recommendation against Dell, due to having only recently
>>>started doing AMD, and due to frequently insisting on selling a
>>>microsoft license with each box. Also, they will sometimes send
>>>parts other than what you requested, unless you specifically say
>>>you want no substitutions.
>>This is very odd. I have purchased about 500 systems from Dell over
>>the last 2-1/2 years. This has been a collection of Poweredge 1750s,
>>2650, SC1425's and a lot of 5224/5324 GigE switches and racks.
> I have a 1024-node Dell cluster. It's great.
2 years ago whe I spec'd our Appro cluster we actually went out for
bids. Dell responded. Among other things, they decided we needed their
managed 100Mb/s switches for interconnect (GBE was in the RFQ), and they
told me we had to get WinXP for our HPC work. They assured me there was
a good fortran compiler and that MPI ran on XP... Their quote was a
factor of 2x higher than the next highest quote.
I spent time on the phone with our University rep and her SE and was
subjected to the kind of treatment I'd received from IBM in the '70s
when I wanted a real-time system for medical research... THEY knew what
I needed and I should just listen.
If they're now easier to deal with, we'll know. I've gotta go out for
bids again in a couple of months for 64 nodes of multiproc dual core.
They'll be on the list but...
>>1) I have never had a problem getting the MS license dropped from the
>>order. In fact, on their web-based server configuration page they
>>specifically have a "No installed OS" selection available.
>>2) I have always received the systems that I have ordered w/o
>>substitution. Any errors in the orders were handled quickly by the
>>Dell sales people.
> I agree with Bill. I think whoever suggested that these issues are
> problems is referring more to consumer-oriented sales than to rackmount
> cluster sales.
> You should have none of these types of problems if you buy
> cluster-oriented rackmount stuff. Just ask Dell hard questions up
> front, make certain that the order specifies exactly what you want, and
> if Dell screws up, point it out to them. I predict that they'll fix it
> no problem; that's certainly been my experience.
Well, our University has exactly one sales droid for all Dell sales.
I'm not sure she can differentiate between rack-mount/cluster hardware
and desktops, although her SE can apparently tell the difference. I've
not had trouble getting servers with no s/w before, but when I was
recently offered the opportunity to look at their blades, I was told
they came with the new Windows HPC s/w. No thanks.
>>As for the "AMD and Dell" part, did I miss something here? While I
>>suspect that Dell has been investigating AMD-based servers and
>>probably has developed some prototypes in the back lab (as Michael
>>Dell has hinted in past press releases), I was not aware of any
>>offerings from Dell that use AMD processors. Does someone have a URL
>>to a press release?
> To the best of my knowledge, whoever suggested that Dell has recently
> started doing AMD is misinformed, at least if doing == selling.
> They're still Intel-only as far as I know.
They've forayed into AMD and back out several times. I don't think
they're selling anything right now that way.
Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager at tamu.edu
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.847.8578
Office: 903A Eller Bldg, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
More information about the Beowulf