[Beowulf] 'dual' Quad solution from Tyan
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Farul Mohd. Ghazali farulg at gmail.comTue Feb 28 07:38:50 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 'dual' Quad solution from Tyan
- Next message: [Beowulf] 'dual' Quad solution from Tyan
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2/28/06, Douglas Eadline <deadline at clustermonkey.net> wrote: > > who says it's so great? the HT fabric is pretty far from a "perfect" > > low-latency 16-port crossbar, for instance. also, is it really cheaper? > > how about if you compare to four 2-socket DC nodes? > > [deleted] > Running benchmarks to get price/performance data seems to be the only > way to answer such questions. So has anyone out there actually run any benchmarks on these machines? Is HT really that bad compared to a specialized low latency interconnect? I'm configuring a small cluster for some people and the prices for 16 node x 4-core with Myrinet/Infiniband/Quadrics is close enough to a Tyan VX50 4 node x 16-core system also with Myrinet etc. The apps that will run are MPI based molecular dynamics and maybe some CFD code. I tried signing up at the AMD Devcenter to get access to their clusters for benchmarking but it's been weeks and still no response.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 'dual' Quad solution from Tyan
- Next message: [Beowulf] 'dual' Quad solution from Tyan
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
