Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] adding a cluster to a traditional supercomputer

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Joachim Worringen joachim at ccrl-nece.de
Mon Feb 13 01:00:06 PST 2006


Florent Calvayrac wrote:
> the question is open for the filesystem ;  should they rely on NFS over
> Gigabit ethernet and attack their "old" fileserver (which is excellent),
> with some fears for some heavy I/O codes, add fiberchannel ports to
> some (or all) nodes on which the I/O bound codes would be dispatched with
> a good PBS setup (best solution but expensive), or add another, 
> dedicated NFS server with
> several gigabit ethernet cards, each for serving only parts of the new 
> cluster,
> this "new" fileserver itself getting its files via CFS, fiberchannel, or 
> even NFS from the "old" fileserver ?

You already listed many of the possible options. It is very difficult to make an 
informed decision as long as you don't have good quantitative information on the 
actual I/O load, and also specify the work-flow and reliability requirements for 
the files generated or accessed. For some applications, a solution like PVFS 
might be sufficient, or even local scratch space might fit.

Adding NFS servers to serve out the CFS to the cluster nodes is a common 
solution, although NFS is not well suited for "real" parallel I/O. More 
complex/reliable/powerful I/O solutions can become quite expensive, either in 
terms of money to effort spent (think of Lustre).

  Joachim

-- 
Joachim Worringen - NEC C&C research lab St.Augustin
fon +49-2241-9252.20 - fax .99 - http://www.ccrl-nece.de



More information about the Beowulf mailing list