[Beowulf] Apologies for the spam/virus yesterday
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Michael Will mwill at penguincomputing.comThu Feb 9 09:08:50 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] adding a cluster to a traditional supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Apologies for the spam/virus yesterday
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I would just have the end-user take care of the rare event of spam getting through. They have to protect themselves already because beowulf is not the only source of email for anybody. I would vote for leaving it as it is. Michael -----Original Message----- From: beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org [mailto:beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Eadline Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 6:21 AM To: Beowulf Mailing List Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Apologies for the spam/virus yesterday I would hate to see this resource change into another form. It truly is an *incredibly valuable resource* with a high signal to noise ratio and virtually spam free - thanks Don. I would also be willing to bet that the collective minds of this list can figure out a way to keep it intact. Whether it be more automated control or the assistance of some trusted members to do the "Turing Test" work. -- Doug > > After having a near-perfect record of keeping out spam and virus > email, one slipped through yesterday. > > It's a good example of why mailing lists can't be auto-moderated. > The current elaborate system requires heavy human moderation, and this > message still slid past everything and was automatically approved. > > The message appeared to come from a subscribed user, so it passed the > first check. (This is actually common: spammers and viruses use pairs > of addresses from the same source, so evil mail is likely to come from > someone you have heard of.) > > The message passed both ClamAV and SpamAssasin (although a compressed > zip file should have triggered something). It didn't have any of the > keywords that are configured in Mailman's "hold" rules. And finally, > that user was approved for auto-post for messages that passed all of > the previous rules. > > Please keep this event in mind before you complain that your message > was held for moderation. 95-99% (depending on the day) of inbound > mail to the mailing lists is immediately discarded as obvious viruses and spam. > Only very low scoring mail from approved subscribers is eligible for > auto-approval The rest is held for manual moderation. Only about 2% > of those held messages are valid postings. That means about 50 > messages manually discarded for each manually approved posting. And > except for a few weeks scattered over the history of the list, I've > been the sole or primary moderator. > > The bottom line is that we are considering a message board format to > replace the mailing list. It would have required logins to post, and > retroactive moderation to delete advertising and trolls. > Any opinions? > > -- > Donald Becker becker at scyld.com > Scyld Software Scyld Beowulf cluster systems > 914 Bay Ridge Road, Suite 220 www.scyld.com > Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993 > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org To change your subscription > (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -- Doug _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: [Beowulf] adding a cluster to a traditional supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Apologies for the spam/virus yesterday
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
