[Beowulf] Fwd: NIS limitations question
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jakob Oestergaard jakob at unthought.netThu Feb 9 00:30:39 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Fwd: NIS limitations question
- Next message: [Beowulf] Fwd: NIS limitations question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 01:37:46PM -0800, Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 07:34:26AM +0300, Walid wrote: > > > I belive i have seen on this maling list*, and other internet fourms** some > > limitation of NIS, but i have failed to find a documented limiation from > > SUN, or from the various linux distrubutions, did any one try to research > > the scalability of NIS servers? > > The standard answer, if you only rarely push, is to make every client > a slave. The less violent solution is to simply run nscd (name service caching daemon) on all clients - that will take a lot of the load off of both your NIS and DNS servers :) -- / jakob
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Fwd: NIS limitations question
- Next message: [Beowulf] Fwd: NIS limitations question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
