[Beowulf] distributions
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.comFri Feb 3 19:56:01 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] distributions
- Next message: [Beowulf] distributions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert G. Brown wrote: <snip> > Note well that for most folks, once you get a cluster node installed and > working, there is little incentive to EVER upgrade the OS except for > administrative convenience. We still have (I'm ashamed to say) nodes > running RH 7.3. Why not? They are protected behind a firewall, they > are stable (obviously:-), they work. Hmm... crispy on the outside, tender on the inside. You have to have an OS installed on your nodes for which security updates are available, or else you can really get caught with your pants down. You should know as well as I do that your users are scientists and academics, they are not security professionals. They'll pick bad passwords, log in from Winblows terminals which have been infected with virae, keyloggers, etc. In short, you lower the security of the system to that of your least secure user. At least if your systems are updated, the chance of an attack escalating priviledge and making the situation serious is small. You can give Mr. Sloppy The Lecture, restore his files from backup, and be on your merry way. -- Geoffrey D. Jacobs MORE CORE AVAILABLE, BUT NONE FOR YOU.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] distributions
- Next message: [Beowulf] distributions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
