[Beowulf] Opteron downrates DDR400 to DDR333 performance?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caSat Feb 4 09:51:46 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opteron downrates DDR400 to DDR333 performance?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opteron downrates DDR400 to DDR333 performance?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> So you could get 4GB of RAM on a processor if you use >> single ranked DIMMs. perhaps this is TMI, but the answer depends on which cpu rev you're using (and whether the bios optimizes the memory controller.) the AMD bios-writers doc cited earlier shows that 4 dimms (2xdouble, 2xsingle) can still be used at ddr400 on rev e. no config uses >6 CS's at DDR400, and some drop to DDR333 at <=5 CS's. > Another generation of cpu/memory controllers will take us to FBdimms which > will for the most part solve the issues here... well, FBdimms maintain a high clock, but stretch latency quite a bit as you add devices. and that's some distance off, I think - rumor has it that AMD is close to shipping DDR2 support. it'll be intresting to see what kinds of latency/bandwidth/loading they achieve there. my understanding is that one of the main appeals of DDR2 is use of lower voltage - presumably for lower dissipation by the memory controller, but also possibly for easier drive of a fully-configured system at full speed. 10.7 GBps should be a nice bump up from 6.4 (peak theoretical never to be achieved in reality ;) regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opteron downrates DDR400 to DDR333 performance?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opteron downrates DDR400 to DDR333 performance?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
