[Beowulf] distributions
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Rankin wrankin at ee.duke.eduThu Feb 2 06:52:13 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] distributions
- Next message: [Beowulf] distributions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Feb 2, 2006, at 8:04 AM, Robert G. Brown wrote: > What we do is use centos for servers (LAN/department servers, that > also > serve the cluster nodes with e.g. home and project space). We use > FC-even revision numbers for desktops, cluster nodes, etc. And for a slightly different view of other clusters at Duke :) - we use Centos (currently 3.x, migrating to 4.x probably in the summer) on the large central shared cluster. We have 500+ nodes right now and are growing constantly. We currently support around two dozen different research groups on the campus with a mixed application pool off everything from roll-yer-own MPI codes to commercial applications. Heck, we even support Matlab to a very limited extent. :-) For us, rolling out a new OS release is a major endeavor. Lots of testing has to go on to verify that applications don't break on us and that all the tool sets that we need are available. So for us, the stability of Centos is a big attraction. Also one consideration for third party apps is making sure that they officially "support" the OS platform, in case we have to deal with their technical support. True, we do run into the cases where a user "must have" the latest/ greatest version of some library they use on their FC desktop, or found in Debian and we try our best to accommodate them. But I figure that we'll have that problem no matter what release of what OS we run. -bill
- Previous message: [Beowulf] distributions
- Next message: [Beowulf] distributions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
