[Beowulf] SATA II
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caTue Dec 5 09:07:36 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA II
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> 1-Regarding OS, is "Fedora Core 64bit" a good option for AMD Athlon 64 X2 > 4200+? sure. distros are just desktop decoration, and anything recent will perform equally well. you do probably want 64b, but that's not rare. > 2- Is SATA II HDD compatible with Fedora Core 64bit? disks don't have compatibility - controllers do. so it depends on your motherboard choice. but I haven't seen any builtin controllers that don't work well. > 3- Concerning RAM, is "2 GB 800 MHz DDR2" sufficient? any general answer is wrong. 2G is a huge waste of money for some applications, and not nearly enough for others. you'll pay a noticable premium for ddr2/800 as opposed to ddr2/667, though, and might not notice the difference (again, depending on your workload). there is only one general correlations I'll draw: many, many loosely-coupled and/or serial jobs have tiny memory footprints (so 2GB is overkill, and since the cache is effective, higher bandwidth is wasted). it's hard to say anything useful about tighter-than-loose parallel jobs, since memory size/intensiveness varies a lot - moreso than for loose/serial, at least in my experience... regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA II
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
