[Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Ed Hill ed at eh3.comTue Aug 22 11:21:26 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
- Next message: [Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 00:59 -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote:
>
> Perhaps in another decade they'll actually meet somewhere, have a
> drink together, and in a night of illicit love spawn a new language
> called Cortran, or perhaps fortraC, that groks both printf and
> hollerith, that has a binary exponentiation operator (the one feature
> of Fortran that I miss, actually:-), that can both do strongly typed
> arrays -- with arbitrary index offsets -- but can also manage structs
> and pointers. Talk about inheritance -- or the need for those
> compilers to use protection, no matter how close they may get...;-)
OK, thats amusing. :-)
But seriously, I've read of efforts to standardize (within the official
ISO documents) the linking conventions so that its easier to call C
routines from Fortran and vice versa. Unfortunately, these proposals
were rejected during the last couple of Fortran standards updates. For
shame...
Ed
ps - Semi-relevant link for the day:
http://www.fortranstatement.com/cgi-bin/petition.pl
--
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office: MIT Dept. of EAPS 54-1424; 77 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails: eh3 at mit.edu ed at eh3.com
URLs: http://web.mit.edu/eh3/ http://eh3.com/
phone: 617-253-0098
fax: 617-253-4464
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
- Next message: [Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
