[Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.comSun Aug 20 13:06:22 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
- Next message: [Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe Landman wrote: > I take a pragmatic view. If a language is well suited for a task, I > think it makes sense to use it. I agree 110%. I think we just differ on the breadth of task for which, for example, Perl is appropriate. > I don't advocate against Fortran. It is a great language, very useful > for its tasks. It is hard to make it talk to other things, and it is 52 > years old. But when I teach an HPC programming class and I talk about > it, students audibly groan and tell me how their CS professors have told > them to ignore it. Then again, most of the kids seem to know how to > program Java, C++, and VB. A few even know Matlab. I think that Fortran is still the best language to use when a programmer wants to concentrate on hard science with maximum computational performance. -- Geoffrey D. Jacobs Go to the Chinese Restaurant, Order the Special
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
- Next message: [Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
