[Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Piskorski atp at piskorski.comSun Aug 20 02:03:52 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
- Next message: [Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 04:56:10PM +1000, Jonathan Ennis-King wrote: > I'm considering writing some parallel code to do fluid flow in porous > media, the heart of which is solving systems of sparse linear equations. > There are some good libraries in C which provide the parallel solver > (e.g. PETSC), but I'm trying to resolve which language to use for my > code. The choice is between C++ and Java, and although I'm favouring > Java at present, I'm not sure about its performance in this context. Why limit your choice to only those two languages? If using not-C for at least part of your code is appropriate (as it probably is), then there are probably many appropriate languages other than Java to pick from. -- Andrew Piskorski <atp at piskorski.com> http://www.piskorski.com/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
- Next message: [Beowulf] Java vs C++ for interfacing to parallel library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
