[Beowulf] Woodcrest Memory bandwidth
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
sNAAPS eLYK 3lucid at gmail.comMon Aug 14 18:29:51 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Woodcrest Memory bandwidth
- Next message: [Beowulf] Woodcrest Memory bandwidth
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pardon my commenting on a discussion that's a little over my head, but if I understand the architechtural differences between Opteron and Pentium/Xeon, wouldn't the latency difference between them be attributed at least in part to the on-die memory controller? On 8/14/06, Stuart Midgley <sdm900 at gmail.com> wrote: > actually, latency determines bandwidth more than memory speed... see > my rant(?) from a little over a year ago > > http://www.beowulf.org/archive/2005-July/013294.html > > prefetch etc. help, but the limiting factor is still latency. Hence > the opterons have significantly higher real memory bandwidth (their > latency is about 1/3 that of xeons/p4's etc). If you look at the > ia64's then they have even high latency again, but they can have a > huge number of outstanding loads (from memory its >80), so their > effective bandwidth is high. > > Stu.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Woodcrest Memory bandwidth
- Next message: [Beowulf] Woodcrest Memory bandwidth
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
