Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] Woodcrest Memory bandwidth

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

sNAAPS eLYK 3lucid at gmail.com
Mon Aug 14 18:29:51 PDT 2006


Pardon my commenting on a discussion that's a little over my head, but
if I understand the architechtural differences between Opteron and
Pentium/Xeon, wouldn't the latency difference between them be
attributed at least in part to the on-die memory controller?

On 8/14/06, Stuart Midgley <sdm900 at gmail.com> wrote:
> actually, latency determines bandwidth more than memory speed...  see
> my rant(?) from a little over a year ago
>
> http://www.beowulf.org/archive/2005-July/013294.html
>
> prefetch etc. help, but the limiting factor is still latency.  Hence
> the opterons have significantly higher real memory bandwidth (their
> latency is about 1/3 that of xeons/p4's etc).  If you look at the
> ia64's then they have even high latency again, but they can have a
> huge number of outstanding loads (from memory its >80), so their
> effective bandwidth is high.
>
> Stu.



More information about the Beowulf mailing list