Fw: [Beowulf] Correct networking solution for 16-core nodes
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl greg.lindahl at qlogic.comFri Aug 4 16:34:08 PDT 2006
- Previous message: Fw: [Beowulf] Correct networking solution for 16-core nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] Correct networking solution for 16-core nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:52:06PM +0100, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > Read the subject. you posted onto this list answerring a private email of > mine > which i had shipped to the guy starting this thread. Vincent, please go into the archive and find where *I* posted a private email. *I* did not. Nor do I retaliate against people who post such emails; I call them out in public, just like I'm calling you out. > You don't design that thing to let it look good on paper. No, the goal was to do great on real applications. And that performance does not depend on answering your theoretical objections. If you'd like to see how we perform on real apps up to 512 cores, please see our whitepapers. By SC, we'll have published results, real application results, for much larger systems. If you think about it, castigating the interconnect vendor which publishes the most performance data (microbenchmarks, HPCC, real apps) for not understanding real apps is, well, funny. -- greg (stuck in Phoenix on the way to vacation, at least there's free wireless)
- Previous message: Fw: [Beowulf] Correct networking solution for 16-core nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] Correct networking solution for 16-core nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
