Fw: [Beowulf] Correct networking solution for 16-core nodes
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl greg.lindahl at qlogic.comFri Aug 4 08:42:28 PDT 2006
- Previous message: Fw: [Beowulf] Correct networking solution for 16-core nodes
- Next message: Fw: [Beowulf] Correct networking solution for 16-core nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 04:36:08PM +0100, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > So for the replacement personnel of Greg, > I understand that your cards can't interrupt at all. > Users just have to wait until other messages have past the wire, > before receiving a very short message (that for example aborts the entire > job). > > In short if some other person on the cluster is streaming a bit at some > nodes, > then you have a major latency problem. Vincent, I would not stick my unfortunate colleagues with this "conversation." No, that is not what happens. Yes, some other interconnects use the same interrupt strategy that we do. It's not a bad thing, it's a good thing. The most important thing in life is to know when you don't understand something. I'm kind of bad at it myself, but you set a record. -- greg
- Previous message: Fw: [Beowulf] Correct networking solution for 16-core nodes
- Next message: Fw: [Beowulf] Correct networking solution for 16-core nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
