[Beowulf] Which is better: 32x2 or 64x1
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Broadley bill at cse.ucdavis.eduThu Apr 27 16:18:37 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Which is better: 32x2 or 64x1
- Next message: [Beowulf] Which is better: 32x2 or 64x1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:04:52AM -0500, hpc at gurban.org wrote: > Hi, > > I'm going to build a beowulf linux cluster for my > coledge. Thay want 64 core cluster with Opteron > processors. > Now I want to know which is better (performance & price)? > * 64 x Opteron Single Core Twice the memory bandwidth. Great if you are memory bandwidth limited. > * 32 x Opteron Dual Core Cheaper, no slower if you are CPU or cache limited. Ideally you would take the codes that justify spending the money and benchmark it on a single core vs dual core node and establish some kind of price/performance metric. If you pay for power, cooling, or rack space you might want to include that in your calculation. The dual core will take 1/2 the space, and somewhat less power. -- Bill Broadley Computational Science and Engineering UC Davis
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Which is better: 32x2 or 64x1
- Next message: [Beowulf] Which is better: 32x2 or 64x1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
