[Beowulf] Re: UPS & power supply instability
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduFri Sep 30 07:29:05 PDT 2005
- Previous message: Grounding..Re: [Beowulf] Re: UPS & power supply instability
- Next message: [Beowulf] mpich2 complain about nodes that i dont use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Mathog writes: > For the experts out there: could a huge iron pipe, or a lot > of iron rebar, produce this much of an inductive load if these were > located just below the floor, say 6 inches from the power > lines running to the racks? The lab in question is on > the bottom floor of the building so there could conceivably > be something like that underneath it. I'm thinking not, but > then I've never worked with the kinds of currents that are present > here. I don't think so -- never heard of such a thing, really. Also, I really doubt that any of the PF measurements are going to miss an actual phase angle from real induction or capacitance on the supply lines, just as I wouldn't be surprised if ALL they return IS the phase angle (which presupposes a monochromatic system, at least in the derivations that define the phase angle and power factor in the first place in any standard physics or EE text). Third harmonics are subtle, phase shifts are not. Also note the following -- suppose that there is enough neutral current to cause roughly a 3V ripple at 180 Hz (and higher fourier components) on the neutral line from IR between where the three phase load runs into the common neutral and the point where the common neutral finally reaches a reliable ground (e.g. building steel). How high this voltage really is depends on three things: a) The length of the run of the common neutral to ground (L); b) The gauge of the wire (A); c) The current (I); (Ok purists, four things but I'm assuming copper as a given). No need to do the math, online tables abound: Copper wire resistance table AWG Feet/Ohm Ohms/100ft Ampacity* mm^2 Meters/Ohm Ohms/100M 10 490.2 .204 30 2.588 149.5 .669 12 308.7 .324 20 2.053 94.1 1.06 14 193.8 .516 15 1.628 59.1 1.69 16 122.3 .818 10 1.291 37.3 2.68 18 76.8 1.30 5 1.024 23.4 4.27 20 48.1 2.08 3.3 0.812 14.7 6.82 22 30.3 3.30 2.1 0.644 9.24 10.8 24 19.1 5.24 1.3 0.511 5.82 17.2 26 12.0 8.32 0.8 0.405 3.66 27.3 28 7.55 13.2 0.5 0.321 2.30 43.4 These Ohms / Distance figures are for a round trip circuit. Specifications are for copper wire at 77 degrees Fahrenheit or 25 degrees Celsius. SO we node that 12 gauge wire (a likely enough candidate for a shared neutral) is roughly 0.16 Ohm/100 ft (note round trip factor of 2 in this particular table). For lack of data I'll assume that each phase is breakered at 20 Amps (note "Ampacity"), which actually assumes runs of <100 feet IIRC (otherwise you have to bump to the next larger wire in code IIRC). 20x0.16 (peak) = 3.2 volts per 100 feet. Of course with LUCK one's common neutral runs are both shorter and thicker, although electricians dislike running 10 AWG because it is a pain to bend and pull through conduit. More often they'll double up a 20 on a shared neutral with an inductive load on a longish run. Another common server requirement is to keep the neutral runs SHORT -- I recall reading < 25 feet somewhere on the net last time I researched this -- which would drop the neutral line IR (peak) to < 1V. My KAW has measured every bit of 3V in our server room, though, on a line being driven at maybe 80% of capacity with its own neutral (noting that this includes BOTH parts of the voltage drop -- supply line too). The three phase common neutral current from non-PFC supplies doesn't increase the peak current, so the neutral line ripple remains in the (say) 0.5-3V peak range depending on how far your common neutral has to go to find building steel or at least a conductor with "zero resistance" tied eventually to building steel (which we will assume is dead solid ground compared to the 120 V peak on each phase coming out of the final transformer, although without knowing the details of how the final transformers are wired this might not be correct). It carries 3x the neutral current of a single line (instead of NO current as would be expected by a purely resistive balanced load) but that's only because its FREQUENCY is 3x greater -- the peak remains a single phase line's peak, breakered at or below 20A. I think that this makes me mistaken (yesterday) about the line heating -- it is at most 3x the line heating of a single neutral carrying the same load, not 9x, because the resistive heating produced by each phase is effectively independent. Still quite enough to make the neutral line hot to the touch where it should be stone cold, because I^2 R = VI = 20A x 3V = 60W per phase per 100 feet (really x 0.707 -- this is order of magnitude stuff). Times three for the third harmonics on a common neutral. So your neutral line contributes anywhere from perhaps 50 watts to over 100 watts (per phase) to room heating inside a fairly small volume of copper, and is basically thermally insulated by the wire insulation so that it gets hotter still. I go into all this detail to help with the Liebert discussion, as in: "how long is the common neutral run from where the three phases are tied together on the load side to where they finally reach a solid ground?" "what is the measured voltage drop across this leg?" "if you put a scope across this line to ground (e.g. the ground wire or possibly the rack chassis, which should be tied to the ground wire I'd guess), do we see 180 Hz ripple with the scale set and triggered in the 0-5V range?" "how hot IS that common neutral to the touch when we crank up the load as far as we can (but under the circuit capacities)?" To sound really nifty cool and ask all of these questions at once, you can phrase it as: "Could this problem be caused by ground loops interacting with the third harmonics generated by switching power supply loads?" as that's the proper name for what this whole discussion is about (although an unusual kind of 180 Hz ground loop -- they are more commonly the 60 Hz ripple you hear amplified in e.g. amplifiers and common electronics caused by differential voltages as objects are connected by wires as if those wires had zero resistance when they really don't). To start learning about ground loops and the many, many problems they can cause you can visit here: http://www.epanorama.net/documents/groundloop/ or (GIYF) any of a zillion other places in webland. To quote one paragraph from this: Common Causes for Computer System Problems Many times when a user thinks that his system is 'bad' or has 'gone bad' the fault is electrical or magnetic in nature. Monitor problems are very often caused by nearby magnetic fields, neutral wire harmonics, or conducted/transmitted electrical noise. Intermittent lockups of computers are very often the caused by a Ground Loop, an electrical phenomena that sometimes manifests itself when a system and it's peripherals are improperly plugged into different electrical circuits. Many don't even know if their wall outlet is properly wired and grounded, an absolute necessity for a computer and peripheral to operate reliably and safely. Have you ruled out Ground Loops in your computer system ? Ground loops can cause problems to LAN connections if not properly wired. A ground loop caused by RS-232 connection to other computer can cause computer lockups. Note that "improperly plugged into different electrical circuits" -- that is, different phases. It is a bad idea and even potentially dangerous to be careless about running multiple phases on tightly interconnected hardware. Where "careless" includes many things -- treating the ground loop problem lightly, but ALSO the risk of certain wiring mistakes (like accidentally cross-connecting the actual supply lines of two different phases through some arrangement of pieces of equipment. Note finally that UPSs and DC power supplies in general have unique ground loop opportunities. This is because (depending on how they are engineered) they may provide a voltage between point A and point B that is dead on some spec -- +5V, +120VAC -- but BOTH point A AND point B may NOT be at zero potential WRT the two wires (ground and neutral) that represent "ground" to your system from the point of view of both signal isolation and safety. These kinds of ground loops are very dangerous as shorting the isolated "ground" to the real ground or neutral can causes considerable current to flow. As in copper vaporizing, fire causing, spark blasting currents. Ground loops can even kill -- the reason code requires ground fault protected outlets on bathroom, outdoor, and kitchen wiring is because the NEUTRAL line of a high resistive load can carry enough voltage to put a fatal current through you (a fatal current being only milliamps at the wrong frequencies, where 60Hz is alas a wrong frequency!) if you're standing on a wet bathroom floor in your bare feet. Old pre-code house. Wiring: two 14 separate asbestos insulated gauge wires running back 200 feet to a 20 amp fuse connected to these nifty ceramic insulators. A space heater plugged into the receptacle. Unseen, the neutral wire inside the receptacle is in contact with the metal of the shiny brass receptacle plate and is floating at a few volts but with a LOT of capacity to deliver current. This doesn't bother your heater -- maybe it is running at 110V instead of 120V, but that's still enough to make it plenty hot. You reach down to unplug it after your shower and WITHOUT TOUCHING ANYTHING YOU SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO TOUCH 30 mA is diverted through your wet torso to ground, and the 60 Hz induces defibrillation. Your cooling corpse is discovered the next day. Used to happen, used to happen. So take ground loops seriously. WHATEVER your problem ends up being, dollars to donuts says it is a ground loop of SOME sort -- the major question is where and what kind. rgb -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20050930/9f459262/attachment.bin
- Previous message: Grounding..Re: [Beowulf] Re: UPS & power supply instability
- Next message: [Beowulf] mpich2 complain about nodes that i dont use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
