[Beowulf] Differenz between a Grid and a Cluster???
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Leif Nixon nixon at nsc.liu.seThu Sep 22 02:30:53 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Differenz between a Grid and a Cluster???
- Next message: [Beowulf] Differenz between a Grid and a Cluster???
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert G. Brown <rgb at phy.duke.edu> writes: > Some of the gridware packages do exactly this -- you don't distribute > binaries, you distribute tarball (or other) packages and a set of rules > to build and THEN run your application. I don't think that any of these > use rpms, although they should -- a well designed src rpm is a nearly > ideal package for this. Similarly it would be quite trivial to set up a > private yum repository to maintain binary rpm's built for at least the > major hardware architectures and simply start a job with a suitable yum > install and end it with a suitable yum erase. But then you need either to: - Give users root access to install their rpms system-wide. Ouch. - Let users maintain private rpm databases (in their home directories, for example). But then you lose the ability to track dependencies on the system-wide rpm database - rpm can only handle one database at a time. - Use some virtualization stuff to give users their own virtual machine. -- Leif Nixon - Systems expert ------------------------------------------------------------ National Supercomputer Centre - Linkoping University ------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Differenz between a Grid and a Cluster???
- Next message: [Beowulf] Differenz between a Grid and a Cluster???
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
