[Beowulf] file IO benchmark
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Toon Knapen toon.knapen at fft.beFri Nov 25 06:55:19 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] file IO benchmark
- Next message: [Beowulf] file IO benchmark
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe Landman wrote: > A little more than a year ago we use io-bench from HPCC which I did a > quick MPI port with. We were showing 1.8-2.1 GB/s sustained to a > Panasas disk (http://www.panasas.com) system from a cluster. We also > used the oocore (see http://www.nsf.gov/div/index.jsp?org=OCI). Again, > using the Panasas disk, we were about 5x the speed of the nearest SAN > solutions on 32 nodes, and more than an order of magnitude faster at 128 > nodes. > > If you want a copy of my rather naive MPI port of io-bench, let me see > if we can redistribute it. If you want oocore, surf over to > http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf0605 or grab it > from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2006/nsf0605/oocore.tar.gz > Not familiar with your MPI-ported io-bench nor b_eff_io, how would you compare both? toon
- Previous message: [Beowulf] file IO benchmark
- Next message: [Beowulf] file IO benchmark
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
