[Beowulf] Why I want a microsoft cluster...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.govWed Nov 23 13:09:10 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Why I want a microsoft cluster...
- Next message: [Beowulf] Why I want a microsoft cluster...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 12:25 PM 11/23/2005, Greg Lindahl wrote: >On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:49:09AM -0800, Jim Lux wrote: > > > The scenario is that I want to run some sort of analysis tool that is > > computationally intensive enough to require more crunch than I can get > with > > a single desktop. > >Maybe what you want is a "cluster appliance", not a Windows cluster. >Fully integrated with a Windows desktop. Then it doesn't matter what >OS the appliance runs; lots of Windows shops have equipment that runs >Linux. the problem with an appliance (which concept I actually like... it pushes clusters to the masses) is the interaction with the IT support organizations.. If it's perceived as a piece of IT infrastructure or equipment, they're going to want to manage it, and if it's at all unusual, then they're going to either resist, or charge you a bunch for handling the anomaly. Or, they'll wash their hands of you, and require that YOU manage it and take full responsibility (and most likely, not allow you to interconnect to the rest of the corporation). If it hangs on the network, then the corporate network security folks are going to want to have a warm and fuzzy feeling that it's secure and not going to be a portal or tunnel for attack. That generally means having some form of automated patch management, etc., which gets you back to having to deal with the IT support organization. If you're contemplating going it alone, and self supporting, the corporate governance and audit folks might also throw an oar in. After all the data you're processing on that beast is probably "internal distribution only" potentially being trade secret or even worse, containing "Personally identifiable information", in which case they're going to want to understand how you are controlling the data and making sure that confidential data stays confidential AND that you don't inadvertently violate someone else's data rights. And, then, you still have the interoperability of data products.. (although, I think that one is the most solvable.. it's a matter of file formats, mostly).. trying to paste the output of gnuplot into ppt. If you have a MS based cluster, then dealing with the IT management folks and the network security folks becomes orders of magnitude easier (and potentially cheaper). All the icky problems of network and data security have already been solved (at least to the satisfaction of the organization). James Lux, P.E. Spacecraft Radio Frequency Subsystems Group Flight Communications Systems Section Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 161-213 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena CA 91109 tel: (818)354-2075 fax: (818)393-6875
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Why I want a microsoft cluster...
- Next message: [Beowulf] Why I want a microsoft cluster...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
