[Beowulf] SC05 blogs and observations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Srihari Angaluri srihari at VerariSoft.ComTue Nov 22 12:58:30 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SC05 blogs and observations
- Next message: [Beowulf] SC05 blogs and observations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Douglas Eadline wrote: > I'll added a note to help clarify the text. But, what I was trying to say > was that I would have put a "big" cluster out where people could see it -- > like everyone else does at SC. Not that a big cluster means a whole lot, > but I guess what I was looking for was kind of a statement from MS. Well, I was only responding to your statement 'Why no cluster on the main drag? Why no big cluster that says "Hey we can play to, look at us, we have blinking lights". For the life of me I do not know why they had no cluster. I'm not even going to speculate.' Also, I don't think you need a big cluster to prove that you have cluster software. And I think that's what Microsoft was trying to do - prove that they do have cluster software now, as opposed to talking in vacuum. From what I heard, scalability and performance are not even in the picture yet because this is the first version of the software, and not to mention what they showed at SC was a beta. So, there was no need for a big rack there :) I think in a way it better proves that they are more serious about this stuff, rather than showing a big dead rack with one or two nodes running their software really. Anyway, let me make my statements true by saying "I am speculating." :) Heh, that was easy! > I had heard from some of the people at CTC that .NET was going to be very > useful with clusters. I think it can work for some applications, but of > course not all. Well, Java is equally easy for clusters too :) .NET is just another enabling tool. It is interesting for Windows clusters because you can quickly prototype and test distributed applications as opposed to writing apps in traditional ways, like using Sockets. Plus, .NET is more friendly for Windows because Windows Server 2003 and beyond have native .NET support in the OS. However, .NET is not an MPI replacement (and frankly I don't think it ever will be). > > Thanks for your feedback. Thanks for having an open mind :) Srihari > > -- > Doug
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SC05 blogs and observations
- Next message: [Beowulf] SC05 blogs and observations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
